| View previous topic :: View next topic
:: View posts since last visit |
| Author |
Message |
powder_pig Kite Builder II


Joined: 16 Jun 2008 Posts: 2118 Location: Portland, OR, AKA Region 9
|
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:18 am Post subject: Primary circle |
|
|
I am thinking of a simple circle kite that has three primary drogue shapes built into the face of the design.
I have two questions.
1. Do you think it will be stable enough to fly without tumbling?
2. Will there be enough air flow through the drogues to keep them inflated?
As it sits now the sail will be about 43" in diameter. The drogues about 40' long. _________________ Ron
It's sunny and windy in the summer and cold and snowy in the winter...this must be what heaven is like. |
|
| Back to top |
|
mototrev Kite Builder II


Joined: 31 Jan 2009 Posts: 875 Location: Melbourne, Australia. AKA lucky "13"
|
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 5:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
I can only comment on the design!
I love the simple geometric shapes Black background, primaray & some secondary colours!
Random patten of geo shapes. Looks like what I had in mind for the next kite
Trev-(R) _________________ Trev-(R)
"I start out confused and end up confused on a higher level."
"There is no such thing as the "perfect stitch" just a series of compromises that an be tolerated" |
|
| Back to top |
|
Pumpkin

Joined: 30 Oct 2006 Posts: 6828 Location: Birmingham UK
|
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 9:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Absolutey no idea.
A round kite with tails will fly
tube tails will stabilise
But these are acting near to the centre of the kite so will be imparting drag and I don't know how much stabilisation they will give
IF you were to turn the tubes parallel to the kite sail just after the opening and fix to TE of sail, they would give stabilty and flight would work..... how well ? Dunno but better then without acting on the TE,
As for inflation...if more air goes in front then can escape from the rear, they will inflate _________________ Pete
Where did you say the string goes? |
|
| Back to top |
|
snowykite

Joined: 08 Feb 2005 Posts: 1285 Location: Oxford England
|
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 10:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
The only might be a problem is the square tube above the centreline as it is putting drag above the centre of pressure, but this may be cancelled out by the 2 below.
JMHO _________________ Trevor
Growing old is compulsory
Growing up is optional
All knowledge is useful, you just dont know when
AKA Region 13 |
|
| Back to top |
|
planish

Joined: 19 Aug 2008 Posts: 1664 Location: Sackville, New Brunswick, Canada
|
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Huh. That's new.
I would worry about airflow over the back of the kite. Will the tails mess up the lift?
If it does fly (big if) suspect the red and blue ones will get bent up a little ways back from the kite. Maybe.
The only thing I can compare it to is my wife's first kite, which was a diamond with fringes (each as long as the kite itself) all along the trailing edges. The upper ones would twist around the back, from the wingtip vortices. The first version had a bow tension line and within seconds of launch, those upper fringes would be wrapped a dozen times around the tension line. We switched to using a dihedral, and that fixed that problem. Even so, the first time it flew in a bit stronger winds the upper fringes got tangled and knotted up with each other behind the kite. _________________ John Rose
"I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar." (Wash, in Serenity)
ToDo list: hand shadow bird graphic on a Dopero; Urban Ninja; Marilyn Monroe portrait kite; another One-Piece Cody; Cody Box; Catherine's Wheel; Dave Wadeson's "Mouse", Manga Multiconos. |
|
| Back to top |
|
powder_pig Kite Builder II


Joined: 16 Jun 2008 Posts: 2118 Location: Portland, OR, AKA Region 9
|
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"I would worry about airflow over the back of the kite."
I think you may be right about the turbulence of the vortex formed by the air stream around the kite. I had thought of putting a dihedral line (horiz) across the back of the sail but the sail would really have to be anchored to the frame to allow it to bend without it ovalizing (if that is a word) the sail...
Hmmmmm...the other thing is it would probably fly (if) at a much less angle of attack than the illustration.
Well...I'm working on another version. _________________ Ron
It's sunny and windy in the summer and cold and snowy in the winter...this must be what heaven is like. |
|
| Back to top |
|
CJQ Grand Champion, Kitebuilder of the Year 2006


Joined: 27 Dec 2003 Posts: 3564 Location: Coopersburg, PA - USA
|
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 9:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My guess the kite will fly with the same characteristics as a Cobra kite. Even though the tails are different. MHO
CLIFF |
|
| Back to top |
|
powder_pig Kite Builder II


Joined: 16 Jun 2008 Posts: 2118 Location: Portland, OR, AKA Region 9
|
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| CJQ wrote: | My guess the kite will fly with the same characteristics as a Cobra kite. Even though the tails are different. MHO
CLIFF |
Which kind of defeats the purpose of the design...  _________________ Ron
It's sunny and windy in the summer and cold and snowy in the winter...this must be what heaven is like. |
|
| Back to top |
|
powder_pig Kite Builder II


Joined: 16 Jun 2008 Posts: 2118 Location: Portland, OR, AKA Region 9
|
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 9:30 pm Post subject: A variant of the idea |
|
|
What do you think about this. It's kind of like a snowflake but bigger and not as complicated.
Do you think it would have enough lift? _________________ Ron
It's sunny and windy in the summer and cold and snowy in the winter...this must be what heaven is like. |
|
| Back to top |
|
planish

Joined: 19 Aug 2008 Posts: 1664 Location: Sackville, New Brunswick, Canada
|
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 3:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| powder_pig wrote: | [snip]
Which kind of defeats the purpose of the design...  |
Just to make sure I understand the design, will it be something like a really tall hat for a three-headed wizard?
i.e. The square, circle, and triangle are actually holes in the face, and you're looking through them down the insides of the drogues.
| powder_pig wrote: | What do you think about this. It's kind of like a snowflake but bigger and not as complicated.
Do you think it would have enough lift? |
Are the front ends of the drogues/tails prism-shaped?
If I had to put my money on one or the other, I bet on this one. As I understand it, the tube tails are attached to the trailing edges of the cells, rather than to the back surface of a flat kite. Not too awfully different from a PL Octopus.
I think if a single triangular box with non-rigid extensions to the TE worked (essentially a long windsock with a prism frame at the front), then a parallel cluster of them should work too. That may be a quick-and-dirty partial "proof of concept" experiment that you could try first.
Ooh... If you made the flake-like part more hemispherical and had more partitions, then it might look like a jellyfish, especially if the outer ring of cells didn't have drogues. Maybe organza drogues. That would be awesome. _________________ John Rose
"I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar." (Wash, in Serenity)
ToDo list: hand shadow bird graphic on a Dopero; Urban Ninja; Marilyn Monroe portrait kite; another One-Piece Cody; Cody Box; Catherine's Wheel; Dave Wadeson's "Mouse", Manga Multiconos.
Last edited by planish on Thu Aug 27, 2009 4:16 am; edited 3 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|